Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mia Horvit vs Qianhui Tang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Horvit vs Tang analysis and find out who is favored!
Mia Horvit vs Qianhui Tang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Horvit has won 39.88% of points on his second serve, while Tang has won 45.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Horvit, in recent form, has won 52.73% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tang has won 52.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.42% and 35.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Horvit has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tang has saved 58.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Horvit has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 25/ 15), with Tang winning 52.17% (W/L 12/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Horvit has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 22/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 19/ 18). Tang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 58/ 54), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Horvit has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.1% of matches (W/L 25/ 14), where as Tang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Horvit winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Horvit winning 2 and Tang winning 0. The last match between Horvit and Tang was at the W25 Nakhon Si Thammarat, 03-09-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Mia Horvit getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Horvit and Tang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Horvit winning 0 times and Tang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Horvit winning 0, and Tang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Horvit has played against opponents with an average rank of 146.3 while Tang has played against players with an average rank of 181.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Horvit has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tang has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Horvit has converted 41.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tang has converted 44.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Horvit 1 - 0 Tang
762
Rank
760
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
887
Rank
617
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
55% (41-33)
Career Total W/L
51% (72-70)
56% (5-4)
YTD W/L
43% (3-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mia Horvit | Qianhui Tang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:0 | 1:50:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (41/71) | 74% (52/70) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (27/41) | 56% (29/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (12/30) | 28% (5/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (36/70) | 45% (32/71) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Mia Horvit
Player
Qianhui Tang
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mia Horvit | Qianhui Tang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (5/4) | 43% (3/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (10/9) | 50% (9/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (89/70) | 49% (84/88) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.32 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:53 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 28.22 | 428 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (243/406) | 63% (379/598) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (134/243) | 62% (236/379) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (65/163) | 46% (100/219) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (24/58) | 44% (28/63) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (190/414) | 42% (243/577) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (5/4) | 43% (3/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (5/9) | 43% (3/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 25% (4/1) |
Mia Horvit Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Mia Horvit
81%
(
59 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruien Zhang
Player
Mia Horvit
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
16 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Korokozidi
Player
Mia Horvit
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Cristina Dinu
Player
Mia Horvit
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mia Horvit
Player
Barbora Michalkova
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
81%
(
66 of
81)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mia Horvit
Player
Ruien Zhang
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Mia Horvit
76%
(
62 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Qianhui Tang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Xinxin Yao
Player
Qianhui Tang
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
49
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qianhui Tang
Player
Misaki Matsuda
65%
(
69 of
106)
1st Serve %
78%
(
84 of
108)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
45 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
108)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Qianhui Tang
Player
Ho Ching Wu
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Qianhui Tang
Player
Chia Yi Tsao
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Qianhui Tang
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
130)
2
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
49 of
88)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
36%
(
9 of
25)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
46 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
66 of
130)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Qianhui Tang
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Qianhui Tang
58%
(
67 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
48 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Qianhui Tang
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Fang An Lin
Player
Qianhui Tang
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Horvit Vs Tang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
